About Me

My photo
Paul Hair is a national security expert and an author. He writes under his own name and as a ghostwriter. Connect with him at http://www.liberateliberty.com/. Contact him at paul@liberateliberty.com.

Friday, April 28, 2017

Ruling Elites Ignored Communist Links of Obama, Brennan, and Panetta

Communist Symbol
As the Ruling Elites continue spreading conspiracy theories about Donald Trump engaging in treason with Russia, it’s important to remember the same elites said and did nothing about the communist links that Barack Obama, John Brennan, and Leon Panetta have.

Dr. Paul Kengor is a professor at Grove City College. He wrote a book called, The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor, which extensively documents how an actual card-carrying communist heavily influenced Obama. You’ve likely never heard about this because the Ruling Elites don’t care about the strong links the former U.S. president has to the most murderous ideology in history.

Leon Panetta served as Obama’s Secretary of Defense and Director, Central Intelligence Agency. Multiple organizations raised questions about his links to the Institute for Policy Studies, a think tank with communist links. Again, the Ruling Elites never cared about these questions.

And then there is John Brennan, who served in multiple national security posts for the Obama regime, including as its last Director, Central Intelligence Agency. Brennan openly admitted in 2016 that he had at one time voted for the “Communist Party candidate.” Not a peep from the Ruling Elites.

American Ruling Elites work against America and her citizens. Their lying about Trump committing treason with Russia is an influence operation designed to deceive and distract Americans from the Ruling Elites’ own corruption. And part of that corruption includes the fact that they have ignored the links President Obama and two of his most powerful former officials have with communism.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Diversity Is Death

Excerpt of Ms. Marvel, Vol. 3, Issue 2 Cover.
Diversity is not a strength. Diversity is death. And about a month ago an executive with Marvel Comics accidentally acknowledged this truth.

ICv2 interviewed Marvel Comics Vice President of Sales David Gabriel in late March. One of the things ICv2 asked Gabriel about was the dramatic decline in sales for the comic book company.

Now the million-dollar question. Why did those tastes change?
I don’t know if that’s a question for me. I think that’s a better question for retailers who are seeing all publishers. What we heard was that people didn’t want any more diversity. They didn’t want female characters out there. That’s what we heard, whether we believe that or not. I don’t know that that’s really true, but that’s what we saw in sales.
We saw the sales of any character that was diverse, any character that was new, our female characters, anything that was not a core Marvel character, people were turning their nose up against. That was difficult for us because we had a lot of fresh, new, exciting ideas that we were trying to get out and nothing new really worked.

Gabriel’s answer enraged social justice warriors and he quickly gave an amended statement to ICv2, something you can read at the full article.

But the truth, despite being unintentionally admitted, remains: diversity and political correctness are poison.

Don’t expect people to stop repeating idiotic statements such as, “Our diversity is our strength.” At the same time, don’t believe such statements. “Diversity” is a code word for oikophobia, and a lot of people know it.

Egypt: U.S. Troops Watch Islamic Terrorists Slaughter Christians

Map Courtesy of The World Factbook
Egypt continues struggling in fighting against Islamic terrorism, with many jihadist attacks focused on Christians. Yet even as U.S. troops are stationed in the Sinai Peninsula, they do not assist Egyptian forces and instead watch the slaughter of Christians. Furthermore, no one has demanded that they stop the violence. And no one has accused the U.S. of being morally irresponsible for doing nothing. There’s a reason for this lack of action. But the lack of action also demonstrates how the U.S. has no obligation to stop every problem in the world — and that it has no desire to do so when Christians are the victims.

Back in 2013, I forecasted that the U.S. intervening in Syria would result in increased jihadist activity in Egypt. That has long since occurred. And while the jihadists target many different people, they have targeted Christians with a significant amount of attacks.

U.S. troops make up a large portion of the Multinational Force & Observers in the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula. They are close to most of the attacks that are occurring. But they don’t do a thing to stop Islamic terrorists from slaughtering Christians. . . .

Read the entire analysis at BarbWire.

Monday, April 24, 2017

Mortal Gods: “HVT” – Chapter 7

Mortal Gods: “HVT” Cover Art.
© Paul Hair, 2017.
Mortal Gods: “HVT” is an original story set in the universe of Mortal Gods. I have published this short story serially at Liberate Liberty and simultaneously at Liberty Island Magazine. Chapter 7 completes the story.

Foreword:

Note: This story takes place after the events of, “Like Hail and Fire, Mixed with Blood,” in the book, Mortal Gods: Ignition.

Chapter 7:

He whipped his assault pack off his back and unzipped it. He plunged his hand inside and grabbed the biometrics equipment. The device was about the size of a large camera that a professional photographer might use. He moved quickly and simultaneously counted down time in his head.

30, 29, 28. . . . But the voice in his head was not his own. Instead, it was the voice of the RMD operations officer who had helped train him on how to collect the biometrics intelligence.

“You had better be quick in collecting all the data!” the operations officer had yelled at him during training. “Because the whole terrorist camp is going to be rushing towards you once you breach the HVT’s quarters!” the man had screamed.

Other RMD officers had explained to Adam that the operations officer yelling at him was a way for them to inject stress into the training (since he would experience stress during the actual war operation).

They had used training explosives and recorded gunfire for simulated stress as well.

But the yelling had only lasted through one training scenario. The second time they had gone through it the operations officer had only counted down to 20 or so when Adam had turned around and struck him in the chest.

The strike had been mild by Adam’s standards. But it had been enough to send the man flying across the room and slamming into a wall. After he had recovered from the shock and pain, he had started screaming at Adam. Adam had ignored him, choosing instead to listen to the other RMD officers as they excoriated him.

They had said that if he couldn’t handle the stress of someone yelling, there would be no way he could handle the stress of actual war.

“Actually,” Adam had told them, “that is how I would handle the stress of war. I’d take out anything that was causing it.”

No one had screamed at Adam after that. . . .

Read the whole chapter at Liberate Liberty or Liberty Island Magazine.

Friday, April 21, 2017

Video Games Help Train Troops for War [VIDEO]

Still image from U.S. Army gaming tech video.
Video games have long been thought of as a childish pastime—or at least an empty endeavor. But they have for just as long been more than that. For instance, the U.S. Army uses them as a cost-effective way to train soldiers for war.

Gaming and simulators do not replace real-world training; they supplement it. One of the older examples of a virtual simulator is the Engagement Skills Trainer (EST). The Army has used the EST for years to assist in small-arms marksmanship training.

And on April 18, the U.S. Army released a video about the Mission Training Complex in Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state. In the video, Captain Aubrey Dustin, Chief of Small Unit Training, talks about how and why the Army incorporates gaming tech into its training.

Did U.S. Officials Compromise a Human Intelligence Source in Russia to Attack Trump?

SCI HUMINT Graphic. © Paul Hair, 2017.
Reuters reported an exclusive story on April 19 alleging that American officials told it that the U.S. government obtained documents from a Russian think tank that showed how the Russian government wanted to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. If this is true, then the American officials have disclosed classified information without authorization. Furthermore, they may have compromised one or more human intelligence sources in Russia. And the lives of those sources may now be in danger.

The Reuters article is of suspect accuracy at best. Large media outlets have repeatedly proven that they are unreliable sources more interested in advancing the progressive agenda than reporting news. However, if this story is accurate, then U.S. counterintelligence should be hunting for these officials and investigating whether they compromised human intelligence (HUMINT) assets the U.S. has in Russia. The key portions of the article are as follows.

A Russian government think tank controlled by Vladimir Putin developed a plan to swing the 2016 U.S. presidential election to Donald Trump and undermine voters’ faith in the American electoral system, three current and four former U.S. officials told Reuters.
They described two confidential documents from the think tank as providing the framework and rationale for what U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded was an intensive effort by Russia to interfere with the Nov. 8 election. U.S. intelligence officials acquired the documents, which were prepared by the Moscow-based Russian Institute for Strategic Studies [en.riss.ru/], after the election. . . .
The first Russian institute document was a strategy paper written last June that circulated at the highest levels of the Russian government but was not addressed to any specific individuals. . . .
The current and former U.S. officials spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the Russian documents’ classified status. They declined to discuss how the United States obtained them. U.S. intelligence agencies also declined to comment on them.

So Reuters claims its sources are illegally giving it classified intelligence. That is enough to start a CI investigation. The article also states the alleged officials won’t disclose how they collected that intelligence. But based on what they said, it hints at human intelligence sources. And that should make the CI investigation a top priority.

Specifically, the claims that the documents originated from a think tank and then circulated at the highest levels of government suggest that the U.S. has someone in the think tank (or Russian government) who collected that intelligence. There are other ways the U.S. could have collected it (if it even exists). But the phrasing is enough to suggest that it was collected via HUMINT.

Human intelligence is among the most sensitive types of intelligence because of the threat to the lives of those who provide it. If U.S. officials are leaking HUMINT they are gravely endangering those lives. (Their alleged comments in the Reuters article may have already alerted the Russians to start a search for a spy within their ranks.) And even if they aren’t leaking HUMINT, if officials are leaking intelligence of any kind they are violating the law. U.S. counterintelligence needs to investigate this story and found out what is going on.

The propaganda organs of the Ruling Class are talking about how the CIA supposedly is searching for a subversive within its ranks. If such a search exists, the intelligence community as a whole needs to expand on it. The seeming flood of intelligence leaks from former and current U.S. officials to the media suggests that there are a lot of subversives within the U.S. government. And the IC needs to find these people and stop them from undermining America.

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Wild Horses Interrupt Nuclear Weapons Test in Nevada

A non-nuclear explosion for illustration purposes only.
Photo by Spc. Casey Collier (2009) via DVIDS.
DVIDS issued a press release on April 17 announcing that officials with the Sandia National Laboratories completed a successful early test of a B61-12 “mock nuclear weapon” at the Tonopah Test Range in Nevada in early March. However, wild horses temporarily interrupted that testing when they ran onto the range right as an aircraft was about to release the mock weapon.

The Sandia National Laboratories press release stated that, “Initial data showed the March 14 test was a success.” But the officials conducting the test experienced a unique interruption prior to completing it.

An F-16C from Nellis Air Force Base near Las Vegas, chosen to drop the test unit representing a B61-12, began with a dry run over one of the lake beds. But during his next pass for the planned release, he had to roar off after a small group of wild horses ambled onto the lake bed. 
A video feed from a remote camera in the area showed the horses trotting away to safety, herded by wranglers: security officers in a white pickup, its headlights and rack lights pulsing. “That’s a first for us,” said test director Joe Simile of Sandia. “We’ve never had to chase horses away from the target.”

The Sandia National Laboratories website says that it “is operated and managed by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation” and that it operates “as a contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and supports numerous federal, state, and local government agencies, companies, and organizations.”